In his written statement, Yalçın stated that a legal regulation that will cover public servants as a whole, solve their problems, meet their expectations and give public servants a breath of fresh air is inevitable.
Pointing out that the segment of the population that is most loyal to their taxes are those with fixed incomes, Yalçın said, “The formula of ‘increasing expenses from the source, reducing income’, which was knowingly and willingly created in the middle of the year by entering the 20 percent and 27 percent brackets, was urgently abandoned, and those with fixed incomes were fixed in the 15 percent bracket.” A painting needs to be brought to life.” he said.
Reminding that 3600 additional indicators were provided to first-degree civil servants with the 7th Term Collective Agreement, Yalçın stated that the pensions of first-degree civil servants and civil servants, especially chiefs and higher education graduates, should be increased to the required level.
“ADDITIONAL PAYMENT SHOULD BE REFLECTED ON PENSION PENSIONS/BONUSES”
Yalçın stated that retirees receive low salaries and that the progressive increase given to working civil servants is not reflected in the pensions of retired civil servants, causing grievance.
Yalçın, who also suggested solutions to these problems, used the following statements:
“The additional payment should be reflected in the pensions and bonuses based on the monthly allowance rate. Instead of constantly funding the SSI by the Treasury, all earnings of those who started working after 2008 should be included in the premium-based earnings and transferred to the SSI (so that there is no loss in salaries and wages) and a resource should be created. .In the future, instead of ‘funding’ to increase the low pensions that will arise as a result of premiums not paid today, by deducting premiums today, all income will be included in the income subject to premium (loss of income). SGK should be relaxed and pensions should be increased. The difference in the update coefficient should be increased from 2 percent to 2.5-3 percent. must find it.”
Yalçın stated that the Law on Public Servants’ Unions No. 4688 needs to be changed and said, “We need to immediately switch to a collective bargaining system where the libertarian perspective is implemented, union concepts and practices are included, authority and representation are strongly established, and the concepts of struggle and negotiation come to life with strikes.” made his assessment.
– “Our achievements should not even be a matter of discussion”
Stating that nearly 4 million public servants continue to work uninterruptedly for the welfare of the nation and the prosperity of the state, Yalçın said:
“The duties, titles, authority, responsibility, career-merit, financial, social and personal rights, retirement system and similar areas of our public servants should be addressed and updated in a general and comprehensive manner instead of individual regulations. Within the framework of the accumulation of the Auxiliary Services Class, transferring them to the GIH class is part of this process.” There is a need for an Engineering Professional Law that will reflect the duties and responsibilities of the Parties, which will be considered as a whole, from occupational health and safety to professional responsibilities, from financial and social rights to personal rights, and will protect the value of labor and sweat. Excluding our protective clothing and overtime wage gains, which we signed and said ‘Yes’ at the collective bargaining table, from the scope of savings measures should not even be a matter of discussion in these days when the 2025 budget negotiations continue in the Planning and Budget Commission, public personnel needs and personnel expenses. “, per diem amounts and overtime hourly wages should be implemented in line with economic indicators, protecting the rights of labor and prioritizing public service.”
