US attack possible-a goal could be decisive for Trump

//

Lerato Khumalo

Vance’s text reads like a preliminary argument for a possible military operation. He is aimed at the violent critics from his own ranks. It has been rumbling in the voter base for days. The Trump-related, right commentator Tucker Carlson, for example, had described Trump as “complications of an act of war” in the past few days. Carlson commented on a direct intervention by the USA with the words: “I think we will experience the end of the American empire.” Trump reacted immediately and described him “crazy”.

But the right-wing congress and Trump allied Marjorie Taylor Greene also criticized the consequences of the saber rattling. For example, the Maga Republicans “fully” had wars abroad of all kinds, wrote on the platform X. US soldiers should concentrate on the protection of American borders instead of fighting and dying in conflicts in overseas that the United States cost trillions of dollars. It is speeches like this that prove how fragile Trump’s movement is in truth. They prepare the president of the headache, which is why even his son Eric Trump steps in and claims that his father could not help in case of doubt.

One thing is clear: not only Iran, but in particular Donald Trump is in a political dilemma. And that should be one of the reasons why, despite all the threats and shifts of fighter jets, nothing happened.

According to surveys, only a quarter of the Americans support the United States in a war against Iran. His own supporters chose him because he promised not to lead, but to end it. Trump’s success of Trump’s Maga movement in the Republican Party is decisive on the rejection of the neoconservatives insulted as the war driver from the time of President George W. Bush. Should Trump now be responsible for a new war in the Middle East?