The public opinion was divided into two about whether there was a 6.2 earthquake off the coast of Silivri. On one side of the discussion, Prof. Dr. Prof. Dr. Prof. Dr. Prof.Dr. Dr. Şener Şümümezsoy; Prof. Dr. Naci Görür’s thesis is missing the sleep of citizens. Although the locations, locations and periods of earthquakes in the Marmara Sea are known, it is wondered how two opposing views emerged. We asked this question to the names other than the earthquake scientists who put forward the “uncompromising earthquake models”.
How are the data viewed?
Working in the field of artificial intelligence and computer systems and working on earthquake forecasts for many years Prof. Dr. Berk Üstündağ gave information to Global Web Özel about how geologists made their investigations on faults and evaluate the results obtained.. Üstündağ made the following statements that Aykut Barka has been a process that has been a process on the North Anatolian Fault Zone:
Historical Earthquakes
“When we examine the historical earthquakes, there are two different approaches.After Kocaeli, he came to Çınarcık and was locked. He could not pass to the West. Fault Kumburgaz, which is the continuation of its continuation, may affect the Istanbul fault. Or if the Istanbul fault breaks, it can affect Kumburgaz. ‘ If the two are broken in a row, the size of the fault length increases. The 6.2 earthquake was a crossing line where the two joined. “
Sea Research
“Sukümezsoy says that the middle part was broken in the Kocaeli earthquake, and the 1912 earthquake was broken with the earthquake. The pre -1999 satellite measurements were not as sensitive as today. Naci Hoca and his team made the measurements at the bottom of the sea. When they looked at the bottom of the sea, they saw that the energy excretion was not in the expected period. They followed the fault in the sea bottom measurements and say that the fault continues to accumulate energy. However, after the 6.2 earthquake, this benefit is expected to be 7.2, not 7.2, they say. “
Seismic reflections
Paleosismologist Ramazan Demirtaş stated that the fault models in the hands of the parties were different: “There are arms of the North Anatolian Fault here. When you look at both the east and west of Marmara, we see 7.6 earthquakes of 7.6 earthquakes. Since fault models are not correct, the difference in vision emerges. When interpreting the seismic reflection sections, many people can make the difference in comments. If you are an expert on that issue, if you go to the right result. Think of it as a brain tomogropy. One says ‘you can caner’, the other says ‘you are not.’ These are x -rays showing the depth dimensions of the place. X -ray with ships. It is necessary to interpret these sections correctly. “
(email protected)
